#117725: "The new (as of Mach 16) display of cards is IMHO not as good as the old one."
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
What happened ? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are taken care of in PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v109
Report history
There was a deployment bug some hours ago which has been fixed, does the problem still persist now ?
I just finished a game (about midnight on the 17th, Central time) ; same behavior was present.
Note that this is not fatal; I can select the "synthetic" display mode and that does not seem to crowd out its neighbors.
If I switch into mobile view, they show up: i.imgur.com/xbTRG61.png
Also if I scroll down to my opponent's screen you can see that they're stacked like this guy was saying:
i.imgur.com/1CZjWju.png
It looks fine in Firefox on windows: 124.0.1 (64-bit)
I'm having this graphical issue in Linux: 115.9.1esr-1~deb12u1
Two solutions I've found are:
- Style bot and manually tweak the width to match what it needs to be
- Switch to Synthetic. It seems that it properly expands when in "synthetic" mode. Also the expansion isn't quite as necessary in this mode.
Add something to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
){kind=link}
