• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What is your browser?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What is your browser?

• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• What is your browser?

• Which was the game action you wanted to do?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Currently, abstaining automatically votes for the player to your right. In situations where lovers are seated next to each other but everyone agrees to abstain, the player to the right of the lover couple is immediately eliminated, casting suspicion on the left-most lover (as they are unable to vote for their lover to their right, the vote is passed on). If everyone abstains, the game should just progress forward without forcing a vote. If at least one person doesn't abstain, a simple message stating "Someone didn't abstain" or something should appear and force another vote.

• What is your browser?