• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• What is your browser?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• What is your browser?

• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• What is your browser?

• Which was the game action you wanted to do?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• What is your browser?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• What is your browser?