#22930: " having all but 1 player be Losers keeps the ELO quite low for all but 1 player..."
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
What happened ? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are taken care of in PRIORITY!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detailed description
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Finding a solution for scoring 2nd, 3rd, etc. would be more in line with all the other games on the site• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
Report history
also, I understand that the ELO system may not be ideal (here or elsewhere), but since it's the system of use at the moment...
I'm fine with ranking first, second, third, etc. in cases where the game finishes "normally" (e.g., the rare case where you run out of tiles). But as I said in that post, I still do not believe it's correct or fair to apply the same ranking method when the game finishes "early" (e.g., the most common case where someone places enough buildings). You can't determine who is second-closest, third-closest to an "early" ending.
In both cases, however, elimination order is always used as a tie breaker -- the first player eliminated always ranks last, the second eliminated always ranks second-to-last, etc.
ELO calculation is done by BGA and not specific to the Taluva game. Yes, you will lose ELO points if you don't win against a weaker player you were expected to beat.
Add something to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.