#24771: "Ship has disappeared from the game using "undo", and then attacking"
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
What happened ? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are taken care of in PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
-
• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
Un-did two actions, then attacked a 1 with a 3 ship
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Un-did two actions, then attacked a 1 with a 3 ship
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
Un-did two actions, then attacked a 1 with a 3 ship
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
-
• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
Un-did two actions, then attacked a 1 with a 3 ship
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
Invalid or missing substitution argument for log message: Action ${actionNo}: ${playerName} attacks with a ${attackerFace} ship (${attackerDieAndBonuses}) but is repelled by a ${defenderFace} ship (${defenderDieAndBonuses}) from ${defenderPlayerName}
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
-
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
Un-did two actions, then attacked a 1 with a 3 ship
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Un-did two actions, then attacked a 1 with a 3 ship
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
The ship should have remained in the game, instead of being obliterated
• What is your browser?
Firefox Linux 80.0.1 (64-bit)
Report history
This issue is not client-specific; my opponent sees the issue as well. Issue persists after reload/no-cache reload
Issue is probably related to handling of "undo", as I did that immediately before attacking
Move #352
Add something to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
