• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• What is your browser?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• What is your browser?

• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• What is your browser?

• Which was the game action you wanted to do?

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• What is your browser?