• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• What is your browser?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• What is your browser?

• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• What is your browser?

• Which was the game action you wanted to do?

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

I'm not sure if this could be categorized under "rules", since bidding isn't in the official rulebook, so I'm posting this as a suggestion:

I don't think a player should be allowed to spend excessive VPs (i.e. more than necessary to win) when bidding for the last "open" starting position. Since there are no more bidding actions once each player has chosen a different position, the last person to bid would essentially just give away points to the other player(s) if not bidding the minimum amount.

I just made the mistake of bidding 4 VP instead of 0 for 1st in one of my own games, not realizing the other two players had already bid for 2nd and 3rd. In this case it was an honest mistake, but I could see it potentially being abused.

(And just to clarify: I'm only talking about the very final bid before the game starts. You would still be able to bid any amount while there are other players still bidding.)

• What is your browser?