#70844: "Combination cards aren't always logged with the highest strength suit"
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
What happened ? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are taken care of in PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs -
• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs -
• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
- Double 9 of Spades (in log) when I expected "Double 9 of Clubs" if I had a pair of 9s (Spades and Clubs)
It seems to be done because the hand ordered it as "9 of clubs and then 9 of spades" and it plays the combo directly without reordering. In this case, the 9 of spades is shown as the top-level card that isnt' covered up|
It's a bit misleading, even if the game handles this correctly and counts it as a Double 9 of clubs • What is your browser?
Google Chrome v104
Report history
It seems during testing, the opponent was able to see an error message that they have to beat a "double 9 of clubs" so the gameplay seems fine
Add something to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
