All reports
dinogenics_displayed reports
#139962: "Split up visitors instead of consolidating them"
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
Suggestion: in my opinion, the following would greatly improve the game implementation
Detailed description
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
I haven't read the rulebook, so perhaps this isn't actually allowed, but when the system auto allocates visitors to hotels at the start of the season, it would be better to assign them to different hotels if possible. This would reduce the penalty suffered when an opponent plays Infest Hotels, and possibly other things as well.• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v128
Report history
27. Sep 2024 14:06 • Starcrest • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
Around move 126.
29. Sep 2024 23:08 • tomcattomcat • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
I agree. Was about to write this. But I also didnt read the rules to deeply.
Was wondering if it mattered if I had a 3 hotel and 2 hotel and the 3 visitors split up into the two hotels.
I rather all 3 go into one hotel so if I had to close a hotel, I can close the empty 2space one.
Was wondering if it mattered if I had a 3 hotel and 2 hotel and the 3 visitors split up into the two hotels.
I rather all 3 go into one hotel so if I had to close a hotel, I can close the empty 2space one.
Add something to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
